South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Kazuhiro Sato, Individually, and Kazuhiro Sato d/b/a Sato’s Japanese Steak & Seafood House vs. DHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Kazuhiro Sato, Individually, and Kazuhiro Sato d/b/a Sato’s Japanese Steak & Seafood House

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
03-ALJ-07-0524-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before me pursuant to Petitioner’s request for a contested case hearing following Respondent’s revocation of Petitioner’s food service permit 40-206-1493. On December 23, 2003, this tribunal issued a Notice of Hearing, Order for Pretrial Briefs, and Order Amending Caption (“Order”) scheduling this matter for hearing on February 4, 2004 and requiring the parties to file Pretrial Briefs by January 15, 2004. The Order informed the parties that failure to timely file and serve the Pretrial Briefs will result in a finding of default pursuant to ALJD Rule 23 and may result in dismissal or termination of the action adverse to the defaulting party. As of the date of this Order of Dismissal, this tribunal has not received a Pretrial Brief from the Petitioner, nor has the Petitioner contacted this tribunal to request an extension of the filing date. Footnote

Pursuant to ALJD Rule 23, a default occurs in a contested case when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. An administrative law judge may dismiss or dispose of a contested case adversely to the defaulting party.

Adequate notice was given to the Petitioner of the terms of the Order requiring the filing of Pretrial Briefs and the consequences for failure to comply. The Petitioner was provided abundant opportunity to comply. “There is a limit beyond which the court should not allow a litigant to consume the time of the court . . . .” Georganne Apparel, Inc. v. Todd, 303 S.C. 87, 92, 399 S.E.2d 16, 19 (Ct. App. 1990). As the Petitioner has failed to submit a Pretrial Brief as ordered by this tribunal, I find that the Petitioner is in default and that this case should be dismissed under ALJD Rule 23 adversely to the interest of the Petitioner.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed;

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



_______________________________________

C. DUKES SCOTT

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE


January 22, 2004

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court