South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
DOR vs. Linda Sexton

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
Linda Sexton
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
03-ALJ-17-0394-CC

APPEARANCES:
Attorneys for Petitioner:

Ronald W. Urban
Chief Counsel for Revenue Litigation

Leonard P. Odom
Counsel for Revenue Litigation

Attorney for Respondent:

Thomas J. Thompson
Townsend & Thompson
PO Box 215
Laurens, SC 29360
(864) 984-6554
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

This matter came before the South Carolina Administrative Law Judge Division (Division) as a request for a contested case hearing by the Respondent, Linda Sexton (taxpayer), to contest a Final Agency Determination (Determination) issued by the Petitioner, South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department). The Determination held that the taxpayer violated South Carolina’s motor fuel tax laws by using dyed fuel in the fuel supply tanks of the taxpayer’s motor vehicle while in use on the public highways of South Carolina. The Determination also held that the taxpayer violated South Carolina’s motor fuel tax laws by storing dyed fuel in a bulk storage tank, which was used to supply the taxpayer’s motor vehicle for use on the public highways of South Carolina.

A hearing of this matter was initially scheduled before the Division for January 6, 2004. The parties have now reached an agreement resolving this matter as follows:

1.The taxpayer agrees to pay to the Department a penalty in the amount of $1,000 for using dyed fuel in the fuel supply tanks of the taxpayer’s motor vehicle while in use on the public highways of South Carolina.

2.The taxpayer agrees to pay to the Department a penalty in the amount of $500 for storing dyed fuel in a bulk storage tank, which was used to supply the taxpayer’s motor vehicle for use on the public highways of South Carolina.

Having reviewed this agreement in settlement and compromise, I hereby order its adoption and dismiss the Petition in this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

RAY N. STEVENS

Administrative Law Judge

Columbia, South Carolina

December 16, 2003


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court