South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. Jimmy D. Floyd, d/b/a Ji-Daves

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
Jimmy D. Floyd, d/b/a Ji-Daves
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
95-ALJ-17-0143-CC

APPEARANCES:
Nicholas P. Sipe
Attorney for the Petitioner

Kenneth E. Allen
Attorney for the Respondent
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION

This matter comes before me pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 61-1-55 (Supp. 1994) and S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-310, et seq. (Supp. 1994) upon request for a hearing by the Respondent after being cited on January 19, 1995, for alleged administrative violations of S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-320(1) and 61-5-50(2) (Supp. 1994). The South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation ("Department") seeks revocation of the Respondent's beer and wine permit and sale and consumption license for these violations.

After timely notice to all parties, a hearing was held at the Administrative Law Judge Division in Columbia, South Carolina on May 9, 1995. I find that the Respondent is not of good moral character as required by the above-cited statutes and order the revocation of the Respondent's beer and wine permit (AI 525437) and sale and consumption license (AI 525438).

FINDINGS OF FACT

By a preponderance of the evidence, I find:

1. The Respondent holds an on-premises beer and wine permit and a sale and consumption license as Treasurer and Club Manager of the S.C. Energy Task Force of Dalzell, Inc., d/b/a Ji-Daves, located at Route 4, Box 88-E, Lake City, South Carolina.

2. On December 5, 1994, the Respondent entered a guilty plea to the charge of Arson, second degree, and was committed to the State Department of Corrections for a term of ten years, suspended upon the service of five years probation. This charge involved an incident in which the Respondent procured the burning of his mother's house in order to file a fraudulent insurance claim.

3. On May 9, 1995, the Respondent filed an incomplete application with the Department to change officers and transfer the permit and license to another person's name. The application was returned to the Respondent as incomplete. The Department has taken no further action on this application.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact, I conclude, as a matter of law, the following:

1. Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 61-1-55 (Supp. 1994) and Chapter 23 of Title I of the 1976 Code, as amended, the South Carolina Administrative Law Judge Division has jurisdiction over this matter.

2. Beer and wine permits and sale and consumption licenses are neither contracts nor property rights, but are mere permits issued or granted in the exercise of the State's police power, and are to be enjoyed only so long as the restrictions and conditions governing their continuance are complied with. Feldman v. S.C. Tax Comm'n, 203 S.C. 49, 26 S.E.2d 22 (1943). The same tribunal authorized to grant the issuance of a license is likewise authorized, for cause, to revoke it. Id.

3. S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-320(1) and 61-5-50(2) (Supp. 1994) provide that in order to obtain and maintain a beer and wine permit and sale and consumption license, the holder must be of good moral character.

4. In South Carolina, there is no single criterion by which to determine whether or not one is possessed of good moral character. S.C. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 2709, 1969 S.C. Att'y Gen. Ann. Rep. 159. Generally, good moral character means that one should possess all elements essential to make up that character, such as honesty and veracity . Id. See also Zemour, Inc. v. State Division of Beverage, 347 So.2d 1102 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977); Broers v. Montana Dept. of Revenue, 773 P.2d 320 (Mont. 1989).

5. Arson is a crime of moral turpitude. See State v. Yates, 280 S.C. 29, 310 S.E.2d 805 (1982).

6. Moral turpitude is "an act of baseness, evilness, or depravity in the private and social duties which man owes to his fellow man or society in general, contrary to the customary and accepted rule of right and duty between man and man." State v. Perry, 294 S.C. 311, 364 S.E.2d 201 (1988). Acts of moral turpitude are antithetical to what is considered good moral character. S.C. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 89-89, 1989 S.C. Att'y Gen. Ann. Rep. 237. Moreover, acts of moral turpitude imply the absence of good moral character. Id.

7. Due to the Respondent's conviction for arson, second degree, he is not a person of good moral character as required by S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-320(1) and 61-5-50(2) (Supp. 1994).

8. While the Respondent holds the permit and license in question for a non-profit organization, S.C. Code Ann. § 61-1-125 (Supp. 1994) makes him responsible as an individual for any violation.

9. 23 S.C. Code Reg. 7-76 (Supp. 1994), specifically prohibits the avoidance of penalties for violations by securing permits or licenses in a different officer's or manager's name, and 23 S.C. Code Reg. 7-78 (Supp. 1994) allows an officer change only as long as no violations are pending.

10. Revocation is the appropriate remedy when a person holds a license or permit but no longer meets the statutory requirements for initial issuance of the license or permit. See Feldman v. S.C. Tax Comm'n, 203 S.C. 49, 26 S.E.2d 22 (1943), S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-9-380 and 61-5-60(a) (Supp. 1994).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the beer and wine permit and sale and consumption license issued to Jimmy D. Floyd, Treasurer and Club Manager of the S.C. Energy Task Force of Dalzell, Inc., d/b/a Ji-Daves, Route 4, Box 88-E, Lake City, South Carolina are hereby revoked.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an agent of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division serve a copy of this Order on the Respondent and the Respondent shall promptly surrender the license and permit to the agent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Jimmy D. Floyd and the agents and employees of the S.C. Energy Task Force of Dalzell, Inc., d/b/a Ji-Daves, located at Route 4, Box 88-E, Lake City, South Carolina, shall immediately cease and desist all sale of beer, wine, and liquor at this location, and shall not permit the sale or consumption of beer, wine, or liquor at this location unless and until the location is licensed with a beer and wine permit or sale and consumption license by the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

Edgar A. Brown Building

1205 Pendleton Street

Columbia, South Carolina



This ____ day of _____, 1995

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court