South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. BK Stop 1, Inc., d/b/a BK Fast Stop

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
BK Stop 1, Inc., d/b/a BK Fast Stop
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
02-ALJ-17-0261-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT

The South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department) initiated this matter by issuing a Final Determination that BK Stop 1, Incorporated, d/b/a BK Fast Stop (BK) had violated 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regulation 7-9(B)(Supp. 2001), by "permitting the purchase of beer by a person under the age of twenty-one," for the third time within a three year period. Prior to a hearing on this matter, the parties resolved the matter:

The parties have agreed to the following:

  • For the violation of 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regulation 7-9(B)(Supp. 2001), "permitting

the purchase of beer by a person under the age of twenty-one," on February 18, 2002, BK has agreed to serve a suspension of its beer and wine permit for a period of thirty days. This suspension will begin on July 28, 2002, and run continuously for a period of thirty days. Further, BK agrees to remit to the Department a fine in the amount of $1,000.00, no later than 5:00 p.m. on July 29, 2002.

  • BK further agrees to require its employees to attend four quarterly seminars, within

the next year, concerning the sale of alcohol. BK agrees to contact John Kirkland of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division within the next two weeks to schedule these seminars.

3. Given the mitigating circumstances in this matter, the Department agrees to the foregoing and accepts these terms in satisfaction of the third violation.

The parties freely and voluntarily entered into this agreement. Further, the parties agree that this constitutes the full and final resolution of this violation and such is resolved with prejudice. Failure to comply with the specific terms set forth herein will result in the imposition of the original suspension as set forth in the Department's Final Determination dated May 31, 2002.

I find this agreement to be fair and equitable, approve such agreement, and hereby order its adoption. As Respondent no longer requires a hearing on this matter, I also order that this matter is resolved with prejudice.



AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



________________________________

Honorable Carolyn C. Matthews

Administrative Law Judge



August 5, 2002



WE SO CONSENT:



Carol I. McMahan

Counsel for Regulatory Litigation



Munawar Raja, President

BK Stop 1, Incorporated


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court