South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Midway Residential Care Facility #2 vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Midway Residential Care Facility #2

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
01-ALJ-07-0100-CC

APPEARANCES:
Patricia Pearson, Administrator
Midway Residential Care Facility #2

Robert A. Hammett
Attorney for the Petitioner

Jerry L. Paul, Director
Division of Health Licensing
South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control

Nancy S. Layman
Senior Attorney for Health Regulation
South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER AND AGREEMENT

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department/DHEC) is the agency of the State of South Carolina responsible for administering the State Certification of Need and Health Facility Licensure Act, S.C. Code Ann § 44-7-110 through § 44-7-370 (Supp. 2000); S.C. Code Regs. 61-84 (Supp. 2000), Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities. Midway Residential Care Facility #2 is a community residential care facility (CRCF) in Moore, South Carolina, licensed by the Department, with a capacity of 25 residents.

The Department and Midway have agreed to the issuance of this Consent Order and Agreement, to include the following Findings of Fact:

FINDINGS OF FACT

  • On October 19, 2000, Department representatives visited Midway Residential

Care Facility #2 (Midway) to conduct a follow-up inspection subsequent to its July 13, 2000 inspection.

During this inspection, violations and repeat violations of S.C. Code Reg. 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities, were cited. Of particular significance, 24 Class I violations and repeat violations pertained to errors in the administration of medications to residents. An additional Class I violation was the failure to document an accident/incident that had occurred on October 16, 2000. The remaining 29 Class II and Class III violations and repeat violations involved, among other violations, areas such as facility maintenance, food storage practices and overall facility cleanliness.

2. Based upon the new and repeat violations, the Department imposed a monetary penalty of three thousand two hundred dollars ($3,200) pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320 (" . . . the Department may deny, suspend, or revoke licenses or assess a monetary penalty for violations of provisions of law or departmental regulations. . . ."

3. By certified letter dated January 18, 2001, the Department notified Midway of the penalty and Midway's right to appeal within 30 days of the mailing of the notice.

4. By letter to the DHEC Clerk of the Board, James Cantrell, Midway Administrator, appealed the Department's penalty by letter dated February 17, 2001.

5. The Department forwarded the appeal to the Administrative Law Judge Division on February 26, and the Hon. Ralph King Anderson, III, was assigned to hear the matter.

6. In response to the Order for Prehearing Statements, DHEC filed its Prehearing

Statement on March 22, 2001.

7. On March 23, 2001, by letter to the ALJD, Robert A. Hammett, Esquire advised that he was representing Midway and asked for an extension of time to file the Petitioner's Prehearing Statement since the Petitioner and the Department would be discussing settlement of the case.

8. On April 13, 2001, the parties met to discuss resolution of issues regarding

Petitioner's violations of S.C. Code Regs. 61-84.

9. By letter to the Division of Health Licensing dated April 18, 2001, Mr. Hammett advised that "...all deficiencies . . . have now been corrected in all areas."

10. Following the Department's request for a more detailed explanation of

corrections, the Petitioner sent a report prepared by the Administrator of Midway on July 11, 2001. That report specifically indicated how each violation had been corrected and would remain corrected.

11. Since then, in an attempt to resolve this matter, attorneys for the Petitioner and the Department have held several conversations regarding the facility, its corrective actions and the penalty imposed by the Department. As a result, the parties have agreed to the issuance of this Consent Order and Agreement.

THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED

Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320 (Supp. 2000) and with the consent of Midway Residential Care Facility #2:

1. Petitioner agrees to withdraw its request for a contested case hearing, Docket No. 01-ALJ-07-0100-CC, filed with the Administrative Law Judge Division on February 26, 2001.

2. Petitioner will continue actions to ensure that it fully complies with the

requirements of S.C. Code Regs. 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities.

  • In consideration of the facility's action to correct current violations, the

Department agrees to suspend twelve hundred dollars ($1,200) of the three thousand two hundred dollar ($3,200) monetary penalty assessed against Midway. Therefore, Midway shall pay to the Department a civil monetary penalty in the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000), due within 30 days of this fully executed agreement.

  • It is further agreed that future violations or repeat violations of the community

residential care regulations or applicable licensing statutes may result in the imposition of additional penalties, including revocation of the license to operate Midway Residential Care Facility #2, and the facility administrator has been informed of these potential actions.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



____________________________________ August 15, 2001

Ralph King Anderson, III Date

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court