South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Sharon E. Dupont et al. vs. SCDHEC et al.

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Sharon E. Dupont, Sandra Scriver, Rosalee Scriver, Michael and Jeanette Dupont, Henrietta Grant, William Gadson, Shirley Grant, E.G. Breland, Mattie Wideman, and Rep. Clementa C. Pinckney

Intervenor:
Kevin Wagner

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Bureau of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, and Cleland Asphalt Plant
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
98-ALJ-07-0182-CC

APPEARANCES:
Mary D. Shahid, Esquire

For Respondent South Carolina Department

of Health and Environmental Control

Darrell Thomas Johnson, Jr., Esquire

For Respondent Cleland Asphalt Plant
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In this contested case matter, Petitioners sought review of the issuance of a storm water permit to Cleland Asphalt Plant by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Bureau of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management. The permit relates to Cleland's construction of an asphalt plant off of Highway 389 in Ridgeland, Jasper County, South Carolina. Jurisdiction is granted to the Administrative Law Judge Division by S.C. Code Ann. § 48-39-150 (Supp. 1997) and §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (1986 and Supp. 1997).

The hearing in this matter was held on October 6, 1998 at the Beaufort County Courthouse in Beaufort, South Carolina. An Order and Notice of Hearing was signed and mailed to all parties on July 16, 1998. However, Petitioners failed to appear at the hearing and Counsel for Respondents moved for dismissal. Pursuant to Counsel's motion and ALJD Rule 23, this matter is hereby dismissed. Rule 23 provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to respond or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.

ALJD Rule 23 (1997) (emphasis added).

By virtue of Petitioners' request for a contested case, they have an obligation to advance their position. Petitioners did not request a continuance and did not otherwise contact this tribunal regarding the hearing.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

Post Office Box 11667

Columbia, South Carolina 29211-1667



October 8, 1998

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court