South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Carolyn Hooffstetter vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Carolyn Hooffstetter

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
95-ALJ-07-0605-CC

APPEARANCES:
Carolyn E. Hooffstetter

John P. Kassebaum, Attorney for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Court pursuant to a Petition for Review seeking administrative review of a permitting decision of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM). The Petitioner Carolyn Hooffstetter, submitted an application to amend permit no. CC-92-297. On August 21, 1995, the permit was amended with conditions to allow Petitioner to make additions to the permitted fixed pierhead. This pierhead is located on or adjacent to the Folly River at 202 East Indian Avenue, Folly Beach, Charleston County, South Carolina.

Prior to the hearing scheduled for January 10, 1996, the parties notified the Court that an agreement had been made resolving the appeal. The Consent Order being presented to the Court represents the agreement of the parties as to facts and issues and the details of the settlement. Accordingly, this Court finds as follows:

1. This matter is an appeal of conditions placed by OCRM on permit no. CC-92-297 (as amended), which reduced the requested square footage and deleted a proposed 6' by 14' landing.

2. By letter dated January 2, 1996, Petitioner supplied OCRM with an alternate configuration for the proposed addition (attached herein as Attachment A). The 6' by 14' landing has been deleted and the structure has been re-aligned so that it will not be constructed closer than 20 feet from extended property lines.

3. Respondent , OCRM, has agreed to issue an amended permit based on and consistent with Attachment A.

4. The Petitioner, Carolyn Hooffstetter, in consideration of the amended permit agrees to withdraw her appeal.

Conclusions of Law

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and issues pursuant to South Carolina Code Ann. § 1-23-600 (Supp. 1994).

2. South Carolina Code Ann. § 48-39-10 et seq. grants the Respondent, OCRM, jurisdiction over the activities sought be the Petitioner.

3. The issuance of the permit as discussed and the findings of fact are consistent with the regulations applicable to docks and piers.

Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED, upon joint motion and consent of the parties hereto, that the Respondent, OCRM, issue to Petitioner, Carolyn Hooffstetter, a permit consistent with the contents of this Order and as depicted on Attachment A. Such permit shall be issued within fifteen (15) days from the date of the execution of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

The Honorable Ralph K. Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge

Dated: _________________

Charleston, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court