South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
William P. Melton, d/b/a Petro Plus vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
William P. Melton, d/b/a Petro Plus

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent/Intervenor:
Reverend Michael E. Sollers
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-17-0029-CC

APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner: Kenneth E. Allen, Esquire

For the Respondent: Arlene D. Hand, Esquire (unrepresented at hearing)

For the Respondent/Intervenor: Reverend Michael E. Sollers, Pro Se
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION on MOTION for RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Administrative Law Judge Division (ALJD) upon Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration of the Division's Order in this case dated March 7, 1996 (incorporated herein by reference as "Order"). After the contested case hearing was held on March 6, 1996, the Order was issued granting the off-premise beer and wine permit subject to Petitioner signing an agreement with the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation ("Department") to adhere to five restrictions. One of the restrictions limited the sale of beer and wine to between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. After notice to all parties, a hearing was held on the Motion at the ALJD offices in Columbia, South Carolina on April 3, 1996. At the hearing and in his Motion, Petitioner argues that the hours of operation of the permitted location "were not found to be a concern" in the Order and thus the daily time restriction placed on the beer and wine sales was unfounded. Further, Petitioner argues to so limit their sales puts him at a "significant and unwarranted competitive disadvantage" with other nearly locations similarly permitted to sell beer and wine.

Larry Dean Runyon, owner and operator of Southside Grocery, which is the closest convenience store to Petitioner's location, testified that his permit is unrestricted. However, his hours of operation and thus the sale of beer and wine never extend past 11:00 p.m. Further, he was agreeable to have them so restricted at the hearing.

Petitioner's location is in a rural area, surrounded by residences. I find that the nearby homeowners have the right to live and sleep peacefully in their own homes and that no good reason was shown by Petitioner for allowing the sale of beer and wine after 11:00 p.m. The arguments by Petitioner only revisit those raised at the original hearing. I am not swayed to modify or reverse my previous Order.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is denied and my previous Order remains in effect in its entirety.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





_____________________________________

Marvin F. Kittrell

Chief Judge

Columbia, South Carolina

April 9, 1996


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court