South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Sammie L. Moseley, d/b/a Bonanza Inn vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Sammie L. Moseley, d/b/a Bonanza Inn
750 Jordan Street, Orangeburg, SC

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
02-ALJ-17-0253-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is here pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 61-2-260 (Supp. 2001) and S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (1986 & Supp. 2001) for a contested case hearing. Sammie L. Moseley (Moseley) d/b/a Bonanza Inn, applied for an on-premises beer and wine permit for an establishment located at 750 Jordan Street, Orangeburg, South Carolina. In its Agency Transmittal and in a Motion to be Excused, DOR advised that Moseley appears to have met all statutory requirements, that no controversy exists between Moseley and DOR, that DOR has no evidence to support denying the application, and that DOR would have issued the permit but for the protestants. Thus, only the protests presented the controversy.



In the instant case, notice of the hearing was provided to all parties as well as the protestants informing all that a hearing would be held at the Administrative Law Judge Division in Columbia, South Carolina on Tuesday, August 20, 2002. However, at that hearing, no protestants, including Isiah Colter and Virgina Reed, appeared. Thus, the protests were waived.



Accordingly, the Department of Revenue shall continue to process Moseley's application for an on-premises beer and wine permit for 750 Jordan Street, Orangeburg, South Carolina.



AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



_________________________________

RAY N. STEVENS

Administrative Law Judge



Dated: August 22, 2002

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court