South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Ibrahima Fall, # 250067 vs. SCDOC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Corrections

PARTIES:
Appellant:
Ibrahima Fall, # 250067

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-ALJ-04-00522-AP

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is currently pending before the Administrative Law Judge Division (ALJD) pursuant to the South Carolina Department of Corrections' (Respondent or Department) Motion to Dismiss filed on September 25, 2000. Respondent seeks a dismissal on the grounds that the ALJD does not have jurisdiction to hear this appeal.

Respondent rendered a final decision on August 11, 1999, and Appellant received the decision on August 17, 1999. Appellant thereafter appealed the decision to the ALJD on August 4, 2000. According to Al-Shabazz, the Division only has jurisdiction to hear non-collateral or administrative matters in post-conviction relief actions filed, in final decisions rendered by Respondent after February 14, 2000, and in cases pending in a circuit court or the South Carolina Supreme Court on February 14, 2000, where the inmate has not had the opportunity to obtain APA review.

The Division could have jurisdiction over this particular case only if Appellant had a case pending in circuit court or in the South Carolina Supreme Court on February 14, 2000. Appellant provided no evidence that he had a case pending in any court as of February 14, 2000. The Division, therefore, lacks jurisdiction over this appeal.

Furthermore, Respondent asserts that Appellant's claim is moot because he was released from prison.

An issue is moot when a judgment on the issue will have no practical effect on an existing case or controversy. Mathis v. South Carolina State Highway Dep't, 260 S.C. 344, 195 S.E.2d 713 (1973).

In this case, Appellant was released from prison on June 23, 2000. As a result, this appeal is rendered moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________

C. DUKES SCOTT

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



February 26, 2001

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court