South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC. vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
INSURANCE SERVICES OFFICE, INC.
2970 Clairmont Road, Suite 440
Atlanta, Georgia 30329-1635

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-09-0518-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER

This matter came before me pursuant to S.C. Code Ann Sections 38-73-1370 (Supp. 1996) and 38-73-910 (Supp. 1996), when the Petitioner, a licensed State of South Carolina rating organization, filed for approval of its private passenger automobile property and casualty insurance pure loss component on November 15, 1996. If the earned premiums in this State for all members and subscribers of a licensed State of South Carolina rating organization exceeded $2,000,000.00 during the previous calendar year for the line or type of insurance for which the rate increase is sought, then pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. Section 38-73-910 (Supp. 1996), before the pure loss component may be approved, notice must be given in all newspapers of general, statewide circulation at least thirty days in advance of the insurer's proposed effective date of the increase in premium rates to afford any insured or affected party fifteen days to request a public hearing on the propriety of the rate increase before the ALJ Division.

Notice of the proposed increase was published in The Greenville News of Greenville, South Carolina, and The Post and Courier of Charleston, South Carolina, on November 16, 1996, The Herald of Rock Hill, South Carolina on November 18, 1996, The News and Press, of Darlington, South Carolina on November 20, 1996, and in The State of Columbia, South Carolina on November 25, 1996. To date, no one has requested a hearing on the matter aside from the South Carolina Department of Insurance and the Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina.

Both the South Carolina Department of Insurance and the Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina have withdrawn their objections to the rate increase request from the Petitioner. The South Carolina Department of Insurance has moved this Court to dismiss the case pending before it.

Based upon the foregoing, there being no justiciable controversy, it is hereby Ordered that the case of Insurance Services Office versus State of South Carolina Department of Insurance, Docket Number 96-ALJ-09-5018-CC, is hereby dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________

MARVIN F. KITTRELL

Chief Judge

Dated this ____ day of January, 1997 at

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court