South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
TIG Premier Insurance Company vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
TIG Premier Insurance Company

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
95-ALJ-09-0210-CC

APPEARANCES:
Gloria Gewelke, Account Executive for Petitioner

Lee P. Jedziniak, Esquire for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION

This matter comes before me on the application of TIG Premier Insurance Company for a rate increase on its lenders' security property and casualty insurance premium rate pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-910 (Supp. 1994) and S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-920 (Supp. 1994). After notice to the parties, a public hearing was conducted on June 20, 1995 at the Administrative Law Judge Division. The request was not contested by the Department of Insurance or any member of the public. Upon the review of the testimony and evidence submitted, the rate increase request is approved.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I make the following findings of fact, taking into consideration the burden on the parties to establish their cases by a preponderance of the evidence and taking into account the credibility of the witnesses:

1. TIG Premier Insurance filed an application with the Department of Insurance on March 20, 1995 for a lenders' security property and casualty insurance premium rate increase. The overall increase requested is 20 percent. Lender's security is a line of insurance purchased to protect the lender by insuring the collateral itself against loss or damage.

2. The filing contains information to support the proposed increase and details various changes.

3. The Department of Insurance conducted an independent investigation of the filing and its Chief Actuary, Martin Simons, represented that the rate increase will produce rates that are not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.

4. The last rate increase for Petitioner was July 1, 1991. In its filing, Petitioner requested an effective date of August 1, 1995.

5. By notice dated May 17, 18, and 19, 1995, in various newspapers throughout the State, the public was advised that an application for a rate increase by Petitioner had been made and that a hearing would be held on June 20, 1995. No member of the public appeared at the hearing.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The Administrative Law Judge Division is empowered to hear this case pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-910 (Supp. 1994) and Chapter 23 of Title 1, as amended, of the 1976 Code.

2. A request for an insurance rate increased is governed by S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-10 et seq. (Supp. 1994).

3. Pursuant to S. C. Code Ann. § 38-73-910 (Supp. 1994), notice of the filing and of the public hearing was published in all newspapers of statewide circulation at least 30 days in advance of the hearing.

4. Petitioner has established that the increase in premium rates would not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory. See S. C. Code Ann. § 38-73-10 (a)(1) (Supp. 1994).

5. S.C. Code Ann.§ 38-73-920 (Supp. 1994) prohibits an insurer from receiving an insurance premium rate increase in any line of insurance or in any type of insurance for which a rate increase has been granted within the preceding twelve months. Petitioner received a premium rate increase on July 1, 1991. Therefore, any increase proposed by the current filing may take effect after the date of this Order.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the insurance rate increase requested by TIG

Premier Insurance Company is approved. The effective date of the proposed rate increase shall not occur before July 1, 1995.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.







_______________________

ALISON RENEE LEE

Administrative Law Judge



June ____, 1995

Columbia, South Carolina.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court