ORDERS:
ORDER AND DECISION
This matter comes before me pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-10, et seq.,
(Supp. 1994) and S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-23-310, et seq. (1986 & Supp. 1994) upon a request for a
mechanical breakdown casualty insurance premium rate increase. A hearing was conducted
July 12, 1995. The request was not contested by the South Carolina Department of Insurance or
any member of the public. Upon review of the testimony and evidence submitted, the rate
increase request is approved.
FINDINGS OF FACT
By a preponderance of the evidence, I find:
(1) Petitioners submitted on March 2, 1995, to the South Carolina Department of Insurance a
formal filing for revision of its mechanical breakdown casualty insurance rates, having an overall
premium increase impact of 6.28%.
(2) By notice dated May 23, 1995, the public was advised that an application for a rate increase
by Petitioners had been made and that a hearing would be held on July 12, 1995.
(3) The filing details miscellaneous changes including the following: option upgrades made part
of standard coverage; seals and gasket previously excluded now included in coverage; and
underwriting restrictions on some plans removed/liberalized.
(4) The South Carolina Department of Insurance conducted an independent investigation of the
filing.
(5) South Carolina Department of Insurance, through its Chief Casualty Actuary, Mr. Martin M.
Simons, testifying as an expert witness, represents that the rate increase request will produce rates
that are not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.
(6) The rate increase request was not contested by the State Consumer Advocate or any member
of the public.
(7) Petitioner's last approved rate increase was effective November 27, 1991.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, I conclude, as a matter of law, the following:
(1) The South Carolina Administrative Law Judge Division is empowered to hear this case
pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-910 (Supp. 1994) and Chapter 23 of Title I of the 1976
Code, as amended.
(2) Generally, a request for an insurance rate increase is governed by S.C. Code Ann. §§
38-73-10, et seq. (Supp. 1994).
(3) Pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 38-73-910 (Supp. 1994), notice of the filing and of the public
hearing was given in all newspapers of statewide circulation at least thirty (30) days in advance of
the hearing.
(4) Petitioner met the burden of proof in a rate increase request by establishing that the revised
rates would not be excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory. See, S.C. Code Ann. §
38-73-10(a)(1) (Supp. 1994).
ORDER
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the insurance rate increase requested by Petitioner is
approved. The approved increase shall not be effective prior to the date of this Order.
__________________________________
STEPHEN P. BATES
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
July ____, 1995
Columbia, South Carolina |