South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
American Modern Home Insurance Company vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
American Modern Home Insurance Company

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance and Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
02-ALJ-09-0079-CC

APPEARANCES:
Matthew Ellington T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire
American Family Home Ins. Co. Associate General Counsel

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire
Staff Attorney
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1. On February 26, 2002, Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina (the Consumer Advocate) requested the South Carolina Department of Insurance (the Department) to initiate a public hearing on the filing of American Family Home Insurance Company (the Company) requesting an approval of an overall increase of +9.3% in its mobile homeowners insurance rates.



2. On March 6, 2002, the Department filed with the Administrative Law Judge Division an Agency Transmittal Form requesting a public hearing.



3. The Administrative Law Judge Division assigned this matter to the Honorable Ray N. Stevens under the Docket No. 02-ALJ-09-0079-CC. A hearing on the matter has not yet been set.



4. Meanwhile, the Consumer Advocate retained a consulting actuary and requested two sets of additional information from the Company primarily consisting of more data for calculation of investment income. Having considered the new information, the Consumer Advocate now comes to the conclusion that he no longer wishes to pursue his opposition to this rate request. Even though the Consumer Advocate's actuary came with a rate indication lower than the Company's indication, in this case, he took into account the hard-to-write market segment serviced by the Company (i.e., the mobile homeowners) and the issue of availability of mobile homeowners insurance for the citizens of South Carolina. The Consumer Advocate withdraws his request for hearing under the condition that this withdrawal will not be interpreted as a precedent for his acquiescence in similar requests in the future.



5. Based upon the foregoing, the Consumer Advocate now withdraws his original request for a hearing in this matter.



6. There are no unresolved issues remaining; therefore, all parties agree to the dismissal of this matter.



NOW, THEREFORE, the above referenced matter is dismissed.





IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________

RAY N. STEVENS

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



May, 21, 2002

Columbia, South Carolina





WE CONSENT:



_____________________________ ______________________________

Matthew Ellington T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire

American Family Home Ins. Co. Associate General Counsel

7000 Midland Blvd. South Carolina Department

Cincinnati, OH 45102-2607 of Insurance

P.O. Box 100105

Columbia, SC 29202-6160



_____________________________

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire

Staff Attorney

South Carolina Department of

Consumer Affairs

P.O. Box 5757

Columbia, SC 29250-5757


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court