South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Standard Fire Insurance Company vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Standard Fire Insurance Company

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-ALJ-09-0056-CC

APPEARANCES:
Thomas C. Salane, Esquire T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire
Attorney for the Petitioner Standard Associate General Counsel

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire
Staff Attorney
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1. On January 31, 2000, Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina (the Consumer Advocate) requested the South Carolina Department of Insurance (the Department) to initiate a public hearing on the filing of Standard Fire Insurance Company (the Company) requesting an approval of an overall increase of +5.6% in its homeowners insurance rates.



2. On February 8, 2000, the Department filed with the Administrative Law Judge Division an Agency Transmittal Form requesting a public hearing.



3. The Administrative Law Judge Division assigned this matter to Honorable C. Dukes Scott under the Docket No. 00-ALJ-09-0056-CC. The hearing on the matter has been scheduled for May 24, 2000, at 9:30 A.M.



4. Meanwhile, the Consumer Advocate requested additional information from the Company. Specifically, the Consumer Advocate was concerned about the sufficiency of the information supporting the rate rquest and he also questioned the methodology used by the Company to develop catastrophe loading.



In response to the Consumer Advocate's request for information, the Company revised Exhibits I, IV, V, VI, VII, added new Exhibit VIII and revised Exhibits IX, X and XI. As a result of these amendments, the overall rate level effect is revised from +5.6% to +5.2%. The entire amended filing is attached to this Order as Attachment 1.

















5. Based on these amendments and revisions to the filing, the Consumer Advocate believes that the filing now contains sufficient supporting information and will result in rates that are not excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory, and now withdraws his original request for a hearing in this matter.



6. There are no unresolved issues remaining; therefore, all parties agree to the dismissal of this matter.



NOW, THEREFORE, the above referenced matter is dismissed.



IT IS SO ORDERED.





_____________________________

C. DUKES SCOTT

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



April 10, 2000

Columbia, South Carolina





WE CONSENT:





_____________________________ ______________________________

Thomas C. Salane, Esquire T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire

Attorney for the Petitioner Standard Associate General Counsel

Fire Insurance Company South Carolina Department

Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney of Insurance

P.O. Box 1473 P.O. Box 100105

Columbia, SC 29202 Columbia, SC 29202-6160





_____________________________

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire

Staff Attorney

South Carolina Department of

Consumer Affairs

P.O. Box 5757

Columbia, SC 29250-5757


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court