South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Pop’s NY Pizza XUE, Ltd. vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Pop’s NY Pizza XUE, Ltd.

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-17-0159-CC

APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner: James Harrison, Esquire

For the Department of Revenue: Dana Krajack, Esquire

For the Protestants: No Appearance
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Administrative Law Court (ALC or Court) pursuant to

S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (2005), and S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-2-260 & 61-6-185 (Supp. 2005) for a contested case hearing. Petitioner in this matter is seeking the issuance of a beer and wine permit and retail liquor license for Pop’s NY Pizza XUE, Ltd., located at 707 Harden Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29205.  A hearing was held on June 21, 2006 at the offices of the ALC in Columbia, South Carolina. Petitioner and Respondent were present at the hearing. However, the Protestant, after receiving notice from the Court, did not appear at the hearing and did not notify the Court that they would not be appearing.

After waiting approximately ten (10) minutes for the Protestant to appear, the Court commenced this hearing. Upon Motion of Petitioner, the Court then dismissed this action under Administrative Law Court Rule 23. ALC Rule 23 provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.


Because the Protestant did not appear before the Court and did not otherwise contact this tribunal to notify the Court that they would be late or absent,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department resume processing Petitioner’s application in this matter.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge

June 21, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court