South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Barbara Wallace vs. SCDCA

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Barbara Wallace

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-30-0122-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Administrative Law Court (ALC or Court) pursuant to Petitioner’s request for a contested case hearing regarding the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs’ (Department) denial of her application for a Mortgage Originator’s License. Pursuant to notice to the parties, a hearing was held on June 6, 2006 at the offices of the ALC in Columbia, South Carolina.[1] Respondent was present at the hearing with both counsel and witnesses. However, Petitioner did not appear before the hearing concluded and did not notify the Court that she would not be appearing.[2]

Upon the motion of counsel for the Respondent, the Court then dismissed this action.

Administrative Law Court Rule 23 provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.

Because Petitioner did not appear before the Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

June 6, 2006 Marvin F. Kittrell

Columbia, South Carolina Chief Administrative Law Judge



[1] The original Notice of Hearing, which was mailed to Petitioner on April 12, 2006, was returned. By letter dated April 25, 2006, the Court requested that Petitioner notify it of her correct address. Petitioner provided the Court with her correct address by facsimile on April 26, 2006. The Notice of Hearing was then mailed to Petitioner at the address she provided to the Court.

[2] Although scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m., the hearing was not commenced until approximately 10:35 a.m. to give Petitioner ample time to appear.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court