South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. W.E. Willis of Travelers Rest, Inc.

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
W.E. Willis of Travelers Rest, Inc.

In Re: DOR File No. 6320
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-17-0118-CC

APPEARANCES:
Carol I. McMahan, Esq.
Attorney for South Carolina Department of Revenue

Jonathan S. Altman, Esq.
Attorney for W.E. Willis of Travelers Rest, Inc.
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

The South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department) initiated this matter by issuing a Final Department determination that W.E. Willis of Travelers Rest, Inc. (the Company) located at 5800 Mt. View Road in Taylors, South Carolina, had violated S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-580(3) (Supp. 2005) by “permitting games of chance” on its licensed premises. Prior to a contested case hearing on this determination, the parties resolved the matter. That agreement is incorporated into this Consent Order and is hereby adopted as set forth below:

1. The Company holds a permit that authorizes it to sell beer and wine at the location, 5800 Mt. View Road in Taylors, South Carolina. On October 20, 2005, the Company was issued a citation for “permitting games of chance” on its licensed premises. In resolution of this matter, the Company agrees to pay a fine of $500.00 for the violation no later than April 7, 2006. It will remit this payment to the following address:

South Carolina Department of Revenue

Regulatory Litigation

Attn: Chrystal Laughlin

Post Office Box 12265

Columbia, SC 29201

2. The Company further agrees that it will not permit the games of chance at issue here, or other games of chance, at its licensed location at 5800 Mt. View Road in Taylors, South Carolina, in the future.

3. The Department agrees to disregard the present game of chance violation, except in the event that the Company violates the provisions of this agreement. That is, for purposes of any enhanced penalty provisions, in the event a subsequent violation of S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-580(3), permitting games of chance or permitting gambling, occurs at this licensed location after the date of this agreement, it is understood and agreed that two prior violations have occurred upon the licensed premises within the last three-year period, which began on November 18, 2004 (the date of the first violation).

4. The Company further understands and agrees that this settlement does not affect or resolve any additional pending or future violation of the alcohol regulatory provisions set forth in Title 61, not specifically referred to in this Order, or any other provisions, responsibilities, or liabilities which the Company has under South Carolina law.

5. This Agreement and Order constitutes a final resolution of the issues stated herein between the parties.

6. In consideration of the above, the Department accepts the payment and foregoing terms in satisfaction of these violations.

7. The parties further agree that they freely and voluntarily entered into this agreement. The parties agree that this constitutes the full and final resolution of this violation.

I find this agreement to be fair and equitable, approve such agreement, and hereby order its adoption. This Court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce this Order. As Respondent no longer requires a hearing on this matter, I also Order that this matter is RESOLVED with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

1205 Pendleton Street, Suite 224

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-3731

May 15, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina

WE SO CONSENT:

s/Carol I. McMahan____________

Carol I. McMahan, Esq.

Attorney for South Carolina Department of Revenue

s/Jonathan S. Altman____________

Jonathan S. Altman, Esq.

Attorney for W.E. Willis of Travelers Rest, Inc.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court