South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDHEC vs. C&S Community Care Home

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Respondent:
C&S Community Care Home
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0334-CC

APPEARANCES:
Dennis L. Gibbs, Director
Division of Health Licensing

Nancy S. Layman
Chief Attorney for Health Regulation

Justin Lucey, Esquire
Attorney for the Facility

Annel Wade Heyward
C&S Community Care Home
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. On November 2, 2005, the South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control (Department/DHEC) filed a Notice of Motion and Motion for Contempt, asking this Court to hold Ms. Annel S. Wade-Heyward in contempt for willfully disobeying the Consent Agreement and Order issued by the Court on March 25, 2005. Ms. Wade-Heyward is the Owner/Licensee of C & S, a community residential care facility (CRCF). Now unlicensed by the Department, the Facility and an adjacent building are part of a ten-acre campus on property near Alvin in Berkeley County, South Carolina, collectively known as “L’il Owl.”

2. The March 25, 2005 Consent Agreement and Order provided that:

a. The Licensee [of C & S] would voluntarily close the facility within 60 days from execution of the Consent Order.

b. With closure the Licensee agreed to:

1. Provide residents of the facility with a 30-day written notice prior to closure;

2. Assist residents in transferring to other appropriate facilities;

3. Ensure that all residents of the facility were appropriately transferred no later than 60 days following execution of the Consent Order;

4. Ensure that residents were given their personal possessions;

5. Ensure that residents were given a refund (as appropriate);

6. Ensure that residents were given their medications (as appropriate).

7. Notify the Department in writing regarding where the residents were transferred, their address, and the date of transfer within 10 days of transfer.

8. Notify the Department in writing where resident records would be stored for six years following the closure of the facility; and

9. Return the last license issued by the Department for this location to operate as a community residential care facility.

Additionally, the Licensee agreed to withdraw its pending contested case in this matter and agreed not to operate an unlicensed CRCF within South Carolina.

3. After notice to the Respondent, a hearing on the Department’s Motion for

Contempt was heard at the Adminstrative Law Court on December 12, 2005. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Court ordered that the hearing would re-convene on January 5, 2006 and that by that time:

a.       Ms. Annel-Wade was to comply with all provisions of the March 25, 2005 Consent Order and Agreement;

b.      All residents of C & S who required residence in a community residential care facility were to be moved by January 5, 2006 and their location disclosed to the Department, along with information regarding their funds, medications and personal possessions;

c.       The Department was to provide Ms. Wade-Heyward with names of facilities where residents might be appropriately located; and

d.      The Department was to be allowed to re-inspect the C & S premises and an adjacent building at a reasonable hour and speak with residents to determine whether the terms of the Consent Order and Agreement were being complied with.

4.                  By consent of the parties and the Administrative Law Judge, the hearing was

continued until January 12, 2006.

5.                  At the January 12, 2006 hearing the Court heard testimony from the

Department regarding its December 29, 2005 inspection of C & S and its inability to determine a) whether an unlicensed community residential care facility was being operated at either C & S and/or the adjacent building, and b) whether all residents needing CRCF care had been relocated appropriately, when they had been relocated, and whether their medications, funds and possessions had been transferred with them.

6.                  During a recess in the January 12, 2006 hearing, Petitioner and Respondent

were able to resolve their differences and conveyed that resolution to the Court. The Court then received testimony from both the Department and from Ms. Wade-Heyward that the agreement between the attorneys reflected the wishes of both Petitioner and Respondent. The terms of that agreement follow.

THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND ORDERED THAT:

  1. Within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Order, C&S Community Care Home

agrees to furnish the Department, in writing, the names of the residents presently living at C & S and the adjacent building and affirm that they are self-care boarders. Additionally, C & S agrees to submit to the Department within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Order the following items:

    1. A list of the location or discharge information of residents identified in Exhibit #1 ( a list of residents emailed to Justin Lucey, attorney, by Nancy Layman, DHEC attorney, on January 11, 2006).

1.      If any of these residents are currently boarders, the facility is to advise the Department in writing that these individuals do not require the care or services of a licensed community residential care facility.

2.      If a resident requires CRCF care and has been discharged, C& S Community Care Home must advise the Department in writing of:

a. The resident’s name and the location where he/she was discharged;

b. The amount of money returned to each resident (any

refund due and personal spending money owed);

c. The medications returned to each resident (as appropriate);

d. The location where each resident record will be stored for the six years following his/her discharge from the facility;

3. If a resident does not require CRCF care and has been

discharged, the location to which he/she has been discharged.

    1. Any existing license issued by the Department for C&S Community Care

Home to operate as a licensed community residential care facility. If the

facility cannot locate any of the licenses issued by the Department, it will

submit a written, signed, dated statement of this fact.

  1. C& S Community Care Home agrees to permit unannounced, periodic inspections

by the Department of the two main structures at 1325 Santee River Road, Alvin,

South Carolina, excluding the private quarters of Mr. and Mrs. Heyward, for six

months following execution of this Order. If the Department has cause to inspect the

private quarters of Mr. And Mrs. Heyward, it will give twenty-four hours advance

notice to Mr. or Mrs. Heyward or to their attorney, Justin Lucey. Additionally,

unless it receives permission from Mr. or Mrs. Heyward or obtains other legal

authorization to do so, the Department will not enter other buildings on the property.

  1. C &S Community Care Home agrees to maintain a list of boarders and

their medications, as disclosed by the boarders, that will be updated monthly for the

six-month period following execution of this Order.

  1. The Division of Health Licensing of the Department agrees that prior to

proceeding with any new enforcement action against C & S or the adjacent building

for the six months following execution of this Order, it will notify Ms. Wade-

Heyward and Justin Lucey, attorney for C&S Community Care Home, to allow resolution of the matter. Thereafter, the Department will give Ms. Wade-Heyward seventy-two (72) hours to correct the violations, as cited, before taking enforcement action. However, should representatives of the Department find during an inspection or investigation of C&S Community Care Home that conditions constituting a public health emergency exist, it reserves the right to issue emergency orders and to contact appropriate parties/agencies for review/action pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-1-140 (2002).

  1. Ms. Wade-Heyward agrees not to operate a facility unlicensed that is required by

the state of South Carolina to be licensed.

6. This Consent Agreement and Order resolves all matters related to the March 25, 2005 Consent Agreement and Order. The Court shall dismiss, with prejudice, DHEC’s Motion for Contempt against C&S community Care Home. No evidentiary matter or charge that has been raised in this proceeding may form the basis for any future enforcement activity by DHEC.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED

This case is dismissed with prejudice.

February 9, 2006

Marvin Kittrell Date

Chief Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court