South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Lionel Sapp vs. SCBCB

AGENCY:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Lionel Sapp

Respondent.:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board, South Carolina Retirement Systems
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
05-ALJ-30-0133-CC

APPEARANCES:
Jeffrey S. Holcombe
Attorney for Petitioner

Kelly H. Rainsford
Attorney for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before me upon the Motion of the Petitioner, by and with the consent of the Respondent. The parties have reached a settlement in this case, thereby resolving all issues and rendering moot the request for contested case hearing.

The issues in this case are whether Petitioner is mentally or physically incapacitated from performing his previous job as a correctional officer, whether those incapacities are likely to be permanent, and whether Petitioner should be retired. See S.C. Code Ann. § 9-11-80(1) (1986 & Supp. 2004). Peggy G. Boykin, Director of Respondent, issued a Final Agency Determination denying Petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits. Petitioner filed a Request for a Contested Case Hearing on April 20, 2005, seeking an Order from this Court overturning the Final Agency Determination and granting Petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits.

During the time this case has been pending before this court, the parties have exchanged additional materials, including recent medical evidence. According to the records received from Dr. Lawrence Bergman of Post Trauma Resources, Mr. Sapp suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Dr. Bergman specifically indicated that Mr. Sapp is permanently unable to return to work as a correctional officer.

Based on the additional evidence received during discovery including the most recent medical records from Dr. Lawrence Bergman of Post Trauma Resources, the Vocational Consultant has determined that the issue of permanent incapacity is sufficiently resolved. The Vocational Consultant issued a new recommendation to Director Boykin to grant Petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits. Respondent, therefore, has made the determination to award the disability retirement benefits at issue in this action.

NOW THEREFORE, on motion of Jeffrey S. Holcombe, attorney for Petitioner, and with the consent of Kelly H. Rainsford, attorney for Respondent,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 

 

_______________________________

Honorable Marvin F. Kittrell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

 

June 21, 2005

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court