South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Aileen Scheer vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Aileen Scheer

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
05-ALJ-07-0092-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to this tribunal’s order of March 21, 2005, each party to the above-captioned case was required to file a Prehearing Statement with this Court and serve the same on all parties within twenty (20) days of the date of the order. However, Petitioner Aileen Scheer has not responded to this tribunal’s Order for Prehearing Statements or to a letter from this tribunal dated April 27, 2005, requesting the filing of a Prehearing Statement by May 6, 2005. Therefore, pursuant to ALC Rule 23, this matter is hereby dismissed.

ALC Rule 23 provides that:

[t]he administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.

Id. (emphasis added).

By virtue of her request for a contested case, Petitioner had an obligation to defend her position. However, Petitioner has not filed a Prehearing Statement with this Court, or requested an extension or enlargement of time pursuant to ALC Rule 3(B) in order to comply with this tribunal’s order. Rather, she has been unresponsive to all communications. Petitioner has been given abundant opportunity to comply with this tribunal’s Order for Prehearing Statements and has failed to do so. “There is a limit beyond which the court should not allow a litigant to consume the time of the court . . . .” Georganne Apparel, Inc. v. Todd, 303 S.C. 87, 92, 399 S.E.2d 16, 19 (Ct. App. 1990).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

P.O. Box 11667

Columbia, SC 29211

May 11, 2005

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court