South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDLLR vs. Metropower, Inc., d/b/a Carolina Power

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, Division of
OSHA

Respondents:
Metropower, Inc., d/b/a Carolina Power
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
09-ALJ-11-0134-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before me pursuant to Section 41-15-600, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, as amended, to review a proposed settlement entered into between the parties on the 4th day of February, 2009.

This matter arose as a result of the issuance of one (1) citation by the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation on July 9, 2008, charging the Respondent with one (1) serious violation of various Occupational Safety and Health Standards for which a penalty was proposed in the aggregate amount of One Thousand Five Hundred ($1,500.00) dollars. The Respondent filed a timely Notice of Protest contesting the issued citation and proposed penalty in this matter.

Subsequently, on February 4, 2009, the parties executed a Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, but not merged in to this Order.

From the Certificate of Posting submitted with the Settlement Agreement, and signed by the Respondent, it appears that the proposed Settlement Agreement was posted in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Occupational Health and Safety Review Board, Sections127-1-1, et. seq., South Carolina Rules and Regulations on the 19th day of February, 2009. More than fifteen (15) days have elapsed since the posting of the Settlement Agreement and no affected employees have either voiced any objection to the proposed Settlement Agreement or attempted to claim party status in this matter.

Having carefully reviewed the citations, the Respondent’s Notice of Protest, and the Settlement Agreement incorporated herein, I am persuaded that the proposed settlement is in the best interest of the parties and is consistent with the provision sand objectives of the South Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Act, and

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the Settlement Agreement be affirmed.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge

April 3, 2009

Columbia, South Carolina


~/pdf/090134.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court