South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
James Myers, Jr., d/b/a Myron’s Main Street Grocery vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
James Myers, Jr., d/b/a Myron’s Main Street Grocery

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
07-ALJ-17-0460-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is before the Administrative Law Court (“ALC” or “Court”) pursuant to a Request for a Contested Case Hearing filed September 12, 2007. Petitioner seeks an off premises beer and wine permit for its location at 63 Main Street, Varnville, South Carolina. The South Carolina Department of Revenue (“Department”) received four valid public protests to the licensing of the location. But for the timely filed public protests, the Department determined that Petitioner met all other statutory criteria for licensure.

A hearing on this matter was held on October 24, 2007, before the undersigned. The Petitioner, James Myers Jr., was not present at the hearing due to his ongoing obligation with the United States military. As a result, his father, James Myers Sr. (“Myers”), appeared on the Petitioner’s behalf. At the hearing, Myers did not present a validly executed Power of Attorney to authorize him to present the application of Petitioner. The Court granted Myers leave to procure and present a validly executed Power of Attorney to the Department. Although Petitioner subsequently presented a Power of Attorney, it failed to meet the minimum requirements as set forth by South Carolina law. A validly executed Power of Attorney has not been filed to date (September 17, 2008).

On August 26, 2008, the Department filed a Motion to Dismiss requesting that this matter be dismissed, without prejudice, to allow Petitioner a future opportunity to reapply for the necessary license or to allow his father to seek same under a new application. I find that the Department’s Motion should be granted.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this matter be DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so as to allow Petitioner the opportunity to reapply for the necessary license(s) if he so desires.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

JOHN D. MCLEOD

Administrative Law Judge

September 17, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina


~/pdf/070460.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court