South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
James Durham and Pondicherry Subdivision vs. DHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
James Durham and Pondicherry Subdivision

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0228-CC

APPEARANCES:
Jack D. Griffeth, Attorney for Petitioner
Palmetto Development Company North, LLC

Etta R. Williams, Attorney for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

WHEREAS the above-captioned matter is a civil action that was filed with the Administrative Law Court on July 12, 2004, as an appeal of Administrative Order 04-123-W, which was issued by the Bureau of Water at the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”), pursuant to violations of Water Pollution Control Permits, 24 S.C. Code Ann. Regs 61-9.122.41(a) & (e) Supp. 2003), the Pollution Control Act, S.C. Code Ann. 48-1-90(a)(1987), and Water Classifications & Standards, 25 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-68(E)(5)(d)(Supp. 2003); and

WHEREAS Respondent South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”) is an agency of the State of South Carolina vested with all the powers, functions, and duties granted to the Department and its officers and agents by statute. The Department is charged with implementation of the Pollution Control Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 48-1-10 et. seq. (1987 and Supp. 2003), and the Regulations promulgated pursuant thereto; and

WHEREAS it was alleged in Administrative Order 04-123-W that Petitioners James Durham and Pondicherry Subdivision (“Durham”) owns and is responsible for development and construction activities at the Pondicherry Subdivision (site) in Greenville County, South Carolina; and

WHEREAS, the above-captioned matter is before Ray N. Stevens, Administrative Law Court Judge; and

WHEREAS, the parties concur that the captioning of the above-styled matter should be changed to reflect the true Petitioner in interest, Palmetto Development Company North, LLC (hereafter “Palmetto”); and

WHEREAS, both parties have agreed to enter into this Consent Order for Dismissal and have evidenced that agreement by affixing their signatures onto this

Order; and

WHEREAS, Respondent DHEC has agreed to reduce the civil penalty in this matter and Petitioner Palmetto has agreed to pay to Respondent DHEC the reduced civil penalty in the amount of six thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars ($6,250.00); and

WHEREAS Petitioner Palmetto asserts that this Consent Order for Dismissal in no way constitutes an acknowledgement or evidence of any wrongdoing or liability of the Petitioner; and

WHEREAS Petitioner Palmetto and Respondent DHEC have agreed to settle this matter.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, CONSENTED TO, AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS THAT:

qThe caption of this matter be reformed to reflect the true Petitioner in interest, Palmetto Development Company North, LLC; and

qPetitioner Palmetto will pay to Respondent DHEC the amount of six thousand, two hundred and fifty dollars ($6,250.00) within ten (10) days of the execution of this Consent Order for Dismissal; and

qThis Consent Order for Dismissal resolves the issues underlying Administrative Order 04-123-W and the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed; however, if Petitioner Palmetto fails to comply with any part of this Consent Order for Dismissal, Respondent DHEC reserves the right to reinstate fully the assessed civil penalty of twelve thousand dollars ($12,000.00) and will seek to hold Petitioner in civil contempt of Court for its non-compliance with this Consent Order for Dismissal.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED, CONSENTED TO, AND AGREED THAT the above-entitled action is hereby terminated with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court