ORDERS:
CONSENT ORDER
This matter is before the Court as a result of the protestants having
protested the renewal of Petitioner’s on-premise beer and wine permit at
2522 Forest Drive, Columbia, South Carolina, Department of Revenue File
#3201-1324.
It appearing to the Court that the Parties have settled their differences,
it is;
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED
That the Department of Revenue proceed with the renewal of
Petitioner’s beer and wine permit at 2522 Forest Drive, Columbia, South
Carolina, Department of Revenue File #3201-1324 and that said renewal be
subject to the following binding stipulations which shall be incorporated into
the terms and conditions of the permit:
1.The current renewal application is amended to be for off-premise
only. Said permit shall henceforth be for off-premise consumption only and
the renewed permit shall so indicate and shall apply to all renewals.
2.The location shall close not later than midnight each night. Closing is
defined as locking the front door so as to not allow any more customers to
enter the store. Petitioner may wait on customers already in the store at
midnight and Petitioner or Petitioner’s staff may remain in the store to check
up and clean as necessary.
3.Petitioner shall maintain and monitor the electronic security system
recently installed in the business, and Petitioner will continue to allow the
City of Columbia Police Department to have jurisdiction over Petitioner’s
parking lot.
4.Petitioner or Petitioner’s employee will police the parking lot for litter
on a daily basis and will also make regular trips around the block behind
Petitioner’s location to pick up any trash.
5.Maintain existing exterior lighting in good working order.
6. Above entrance to the store Petitioner will within 60 days repair,
paint and replace the missing lettering.
7.Petitioner will keep the entrance to the store clean and neat. Petitioner
shall minimize signage in the front windows so as not to block the
cashier’s view of the exterior.
A violation of any of the above stipulations shall be considered a violation
of
the terms and conditions of the permit.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED
October 21, 2004Ralph King Anderson, III
Columbia, South CarolinaAdministrative Law Judge |
