South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. Hutson Alley Partners, LLC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
Hutson Alley Partners, LLC

In Re: Violation on May 18, 2006
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-17-0832-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the South Carolina Administrative Law Court (“ALC”) pursuant to the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division’s (“SLED”) issuance of a citation to the Hutson Alley Partners, LLC (“the Licensee”) for violating S.C. Code Ann. Section 61-4-160 (Supp. 2006) on May 18, 2006 by selling a beer for less than one-half price and at a reduced rate during hours other than 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The South Carolina Department of Revenue (“Department”) issued its Department Determination on October 13, 2006, finding that the Licensee indeed violated Section 61-4-160 on May 18, 2006, and that as a second violation of the beer and wine provisions of Title 61 of the S.C. Code of Laws in a three year period, a monetary penalty in the amount of $1,000.00 is appropriate under the authority granted the Department in S.C. Code Ann. Section 61-4-250 (Supp. 2006), which provides that a monetary penalty may be imposed for such violations. The Licensee appealed this Determination to the ALC by requesting a contested case hearing on the matter.

The parties have now reached an agreement resolving this matter as follows:

1.      The Licensee admits to violating Section 61-4-160 on May 18, 2006 by selling a beer for less than on half price regularly charged, and at a reduced rate, during hours other than 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., with such regularly charged price having been established as $4.00 on May 17 and May 19, 2006.

2.      The Licensee will pay a $500.00 fine, and will not return to the practice of selling Corona beers for one dollar all night on Thursdays.

3.      The violation of Section 61-4-160 on May 18, 2006 will not count for enhanced penalty purposes under SC Rev. Proc. #04-04.

Having reviewed this agreement in settlement and compromise as set forth, I hereby order its adoption and dismiss the Petition in this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

JOHN D. MCLEOD

Administrative Law Judge

April 5, 2007

Columbia, South Carolina


~/pdf/060832.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court